Independent · Evidence-led · We don't sell peptides
EU / NordicsUpdated weeklyEN
First published

GLP-1 persistence in the US military

A 10,649-patient Military Health System database study found tirzepatide had 81.9% one-year persistence vs 70.7% for semaglutide and 34.2% for liraglutide.

Why we wrote this. Military health system data removes insurance noise, giving the cleanest real-world persistence signal yet for the GLP-1 class head-to-head comparison.

In this article (6 sections)
  1. What the study measured and how
  2. The one-year persistence and adherence numbers
  3. How this fits with broader real-world evidence
  4. Limits to read before drawing conclusions
  5. What the gender finding adds
  6. What this means in practice

A retrospective database study published 9 July 2026 in Military Medicine tracked 10,649 active duty US service members who started a GLP-1 receptor agonist for weight management between 2021 and 2025[1]. The study measured persistence (defined as continuing therapy without a gap of more than 90 days) and medication adherence across three agents: liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide. The findings add a distinct population angle to the growing body of real-world evidence on how well patients actually stay on these medications over time.

What the study measured and how

The research team, led by Luke B Miller and colleagues at the Military Health System, drew on a claims-level database covering the Defense Health Agency network. Persistence was the primary outcome: the time from therapy initiation to the first treatment gap of more than 90 consecutive days. Adherence was calculated as the proportion of days covered (PDC) over each year of follow-up. The authors also fitted a Cox proportional hazards model to identify patient characteristics associated with discontinuation[1].

Active duty service members are a distinct clinical population. They face weight and fitness standards set by each branch of the military, they access care through a single-payer system (TRICARE) rather than fragmented commercial insurance, and their occupational demands can interact with medication side effects in ways that differ from civilian patients. These features make the cohort informative precisely because it removes some of the insurance-access noise that complicates civilian real-world data.

The one-year persistence and adherence numbers

One-year persistence rates separated sharply across the three agents. Tirzepatide showed the highest continuation at 81.9%, followed by semaglutide at 70.7%, with liraglutide substantially lower at 34.2%[1]. Mean annual adherence as measured by PDC followed the same ordering: tirzepatide 78.2%, semaglutide 71.6%, liraglutide 48.7%. The differences between agents were statistically significant on log-rank testing (P less than .001).

The Cox model estimated tirzepatide carried a 33% lower hazard of discontinuation compared to semaglutide (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.74), while liraglutide carried a 26% higher discontinuation hazard than semaglutide (hazard ratio 1.26)[1]. Male service members showed a 12% higher discontinuation hazard than female service members (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.22), a finding the authors flagged for further investigation given that males make up a larger share of the active duty force.

How this fits with broader real-world evidence

The military study sits alongside a growing international dataset on GLP-1 real-world persistence. A 2026 narrative review in Nutrients, drawing on cohorts across Europe and Latin America, found one-year persistence as high as 75 to 80% in reimbursed type-2 diabetes cohorts in Scandinavia, but below 10% in obesity-focused settings with high out-of-pocket costs[2]. The military cohort's single-payer structure and relatively high persistence numbers are consistent with the Scandinavian end of that spectrum, suggesting that cost and access barriers drive a meaningful share of real-world discontinuation in civilian settings.

A separate 2026 narrative review in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism found that discontinuation in civilian cohorts is often nonpermanent and is driven primarily by gastrointestinal tolerability and economic constraints[3]. The military study does not break out discontinuation reasons, but the access stability of TRICARE coverage removes the economic variable, making tolerability and occupational factors the most likely remaining drivers of any attrition.

Limits to read before drawing conclusions

Three caveats apply. First, this is a retrospective claims analysis, not a randomised trial. Service members were not randomly assigned to agents; prescriber preference, formulary access, and patient characteristics all influenced which drug was used. Tirzepatide became available later in the study window than liraglutide, so its cohort is likely subject to a maturation effect: the sickest or least-adherent patients may have already cycled through the earlier agents before tirzepatide was an option.

Second, the outcome definition matters. A 90-day gap threshold for defining discontinuation is a common convention but is not universal. Studies using 30-day or 60-day gaps would report lower persistence numbers for the same underlying behaviour. Readers comparing the 81.9% tirzepatide figure to numbers from other real-world studies should check whether those studies used the same gap definition.

Third, active duty personnel are not a representative sample of the general adult population. They are younger on average, pass fitness standards to enter and remain in service, and have stable health care access. Generalising the persistence rates to civilian weight management programmes should be done with care.

What the gender finding adds

The 12% higher discontinuation hazard for male service members warrants attention. Active duty males outnumber females and face the same weight standards, but occupational exposures, side-effect tolerance thresholds, and help-seeking behaviours differ across the force. The authors describe this as a finding requiring further study rather than an established explanation[1]. If replicated, it could inform how weight management programmes are structured within military branches that are predominantly male.

What this means in practice

The study does not recommend specific agents or doses. The literature reports doses spanning the titration schedules described in the prescribing information for each drug. Decisions about which GLP-1 receptor agonist is appropriate, at what dose and for how long, belong with a clinician who knows the individual patient's history, occupational demands, and comorbidities. For approved indications and regulatory status by country, the tirzepatide overview page and the semaglutide overview page cover the current picture. This article is for educational and journalistic purposes only.

Frequently asked

What did the Military Health System study find about GLP-1 persistence?

The study tracked 10,649 active duty service members and found one-year persistence of 81.9% for tirzepatide, 70.7% for semaglutide, and 34.2% for liraglutide. Tirzepatide also showed a 33% lower hazard of discontinuation compared to semaglutide in the adjusted Cox model (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.74).

Why might military service members show higher GLP-1 persistence than civilian patients?

Active duty personnel access care through TRICARE, the military single-payer system, which removes the cost and insurance-access barriers that drive much civilian discontinuation. Occupational fitness standards may also motivate continued use. International real-world data shows persistence is substantially lower in settings with high out-of-pocket costs.

Why did male service members discontinue GLP-1 treatment more often than females?

The study found males had a 12% higher hazard of discontinuation than females (HR 1.12), but the authors did not identify a confirmed mechanism. Potential factors include differences in side-effect tolerance, help-seeking behaviour, or occupational pressures. The finding is described as requiring further investigation.

Can these persistence numbers be compared directly to civilian real-world studies?

With caution. The military cohort is younger, has uniform health care access, and must meet fitness standards. The 90-day gap threshold for defining discontinuation is a common but not universal convention. Studies using shorter gap thresholds report lower persistence numbers for the same underlying behaviour, so threshold differences must be checked before comparing figures across datasets.

Sources

  1. [1]Miller LB et al. Patterns of Use for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in a Weight Management Cohort: A Military Health System Database Analysis of Active Duty Service Members From 2021 to 2025. Military Medicine. 2026 Jul 9. PMID 42424303Tier 1 · primary
  2. [2]Dziewierz A, Siudak Z. Adherence and Persistence with GLP-1-Based Therapies: International Real-World Evidence and the Role of Nutritional and Lifestyle Support. Nutrients. 2026 May 30;18(11):1761. PMID 42280404Tier 1 · primary
  3. [3]Heisey HD et al. Rates of, Reasons for, and Reactions to Discontinuation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Narrative Review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2026 Aug. PMID 42244474Tier 1 · primary

No revisions yet. First published .

About the editorial team

PeptideMethods is written and edited by the PeptideMethods Editorial Team and published by Digital Compass Group Ltd. The team is not made up of medical professionals; every health, regulatory or dosage claim on the site is tied to a primary source and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified clinician.

See our editorial policy and methodology for how we research, source and verify.

Read the pillars