Independent · Evidence-led · We don't sell peptides
EU / NordicsUpdated weeklyEN
First published

CJC-1295/Ipamorelin 10 mg Blend Dosing

How to calculate the dose from a CJC-1295/ipamorelin 10 mg blend vial. Step-by-step reconstitution math and what the research actually supports.

Why we wrote this. Community users consistently confuse blend vs per-peptide dosing and syringe-unit math. We walk through the arithmetic and flag the evidence gaps.

In this article (6 sections)
  1. What is in a 10 mg blend vial
  2. Reconstitution math, step by step
  3. Why the "200 mcg" figure circulates
  4. CJC-1295 with DAC vs without DAC (MOD-GRF 1-29)
  5. What the published literature does not tell us
  6. A note on safety

A 10 mg CJC-1295/ipamorelin blend vial typically contains 5 mg of each peptide (10 mg total). When community forums cite "200 mcg" as a common dose, they mean 200 mcg of the combined blend per injection, not 200 mcg of each peptide separately. The confusion is reasonable: vendor labels rarely spell this out, and peptide-reconstitution calculators sometimes default to single-compound math. Here is how the arithmetic actually works, what the published literature says about each peptide, and what it does not say about the combination.

What is in a 10 mg blend vial

Grey-market "CJC-1295/ipamorelin blend" vials are not standardised products. There is no pharmacopoeia monograph, no FDA-approved label, and no EMA marketing authorisation for either peptide alone or in combination[1][2]. That said, the most common configuration sold online is 5 mg CJC-1295 (usually the no-DAC version, also called MOD-GRF 1-29) plus 5 mg ipamorelin lyophilised together in one vial, labelled as "10 mg blend." Some vendors sell 5 mg/5 mg blends labelled as "5 mg" (listing only one peptide's weight). Always check the certificate of analysis, if one exists, for the actual content per vial.

Reconstitution math, step by step

The concentration of your reconstituted solution depends on two numbers: the total peptide mass in the vial (in micrograms) and the volume of bacteriostatic water you add (in millilitres). Everything else follows from division.

Converting the vial to a working concentration

A 10 mg vial contains 10,000 mcg of total peptide. If you add 2 mL of bacteriostatic water, the concentration is 10,000 mcg / 2 mL = 5,000 mcg per mL. If you add 3 mL, the concentration is 10,000 mcg / 3 mL = approximately 3,333 mcg per mL.

From concentration to syringe units

Standard U-100 insulin syringes are calibrated so that 100 "units" on the barrel equals 1 mL. That means each tick mark (1 unit) equals 0.01 mL. Once you know your concentration in mcg per mL, dividing the desired dose (in mcg) by that concentration gives you the volume in mL, which you convert to syringe units by multiplying by 100.

Worked example with 3 mL of bacteriostatic water added to a 10 mg vial: concentration = 3,333 mcg/mL. For a 200 mcg dose: 200 / 3,333 = 0.06 mL = 6 units on a U-100 syringe. For the same vial reconstituted with 2 mL instead: concentration = 5,000 mcg/mL. For a 200 mcg dose: 200 / 5,000 = 0.04 mL = 4 units.

This is where the "6 units vs 12 units" confusion in community posts comes from. The number of syringe units depends entirely on how much water you added. Two people using the same vial and targeting the same 200 mcg dose will draw different volumes if they reconstituted with different amounts of water. Neither is wrong; they are measuring the same mass of peptide in different concentrations.

Why the "200 mcg" figure circulates

Neither CJC-1295 nor ipamorelin has a regulatory-approved dose for any human indication. The 200 mcg figure that appears across forums and vendor sites is not from a clinical guideline. It traces loosely to the dose range explored in the only published human pharmacokinetic study of CJC-1295, by Teichman et al. in 2006, which tested single and repeated subcutaneous doses of 30 to 60 mcg/kg in healthy adults[3]. For a 75 kg person, 30 mcg/kg would be 2,250 mcg (not 200 mcg), so the community dose is well below the studied range. The number appears to have been carried forward through forum convention rather than through any clinical reasoning.

For ipamorelin, the published human pharmacokinetic data is even thinner. Its original characterisation by Raun et al. in 1998 established its selectivity for growth-hormone release over ACTH and cortisol in animal models[4], but no published Phase 2 or Phase 3 efficacy trial in humans has defined a therapeutic dose range. The FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee reviewed ipamorelin in October 2024 and did not recommend it for inclusion on the 503A bulks list[5].

CJC-1295 with DAC vs without DAC (MOD-GRF 1-29)

The "CJC-1295" in most blend vials is MOD-GRF(1-29), the version without the drug-affinity complex (DAC). The DAC version binds covalently to serum albumin after injection, extending the half-life to roughly 6 to 8 days[6]. MOD-GRF(1-29) lacks this albumin-binding modification and has a much shorter half-life. The two are different molecules with different pharmacokinetics, and the reconstitution math is the same for both, but the dosing frequency community users report differs. Vendor labels do not always specify which version is in the vial. If the label says only "CJC-1295" without mentioning DAC, it is usually the no-DAC (MOD-GRF) form, but you cannot be certain without third-party testing.

What the published literature does not tell us

There is no published clinical trial testing the CJC-1295/ipamorelin combination in humans at any dose. A 2026 review of injectable peptide therapy in sports medicine noted that information about "indications, dosing, frequency, and duration of treatment remains unknown" for growth-hormone secretagogue combinations[7]. We do not know the optimal ratio of the two peptides, whether combining them in a single vial affects stability or bioavailability, or what adverse-event profile the combination produces at any dose. Forum-sourced dosing protocols are empirical guesses, not evidence-based recommendations.

We also do not know the purity, identity, or sterility of grey-market blend vials. Independent analyses of research-chemical peptide products have found mislabelling and contamination. A dosing calculation is only as reliable as the label it starts from.

A note on safety

Both CJC-1295 and ipamorelin are unapproved substances with no marketing authorisation from the FDA, EMA, MHRA, or any national medicines agency tracked on this site. They are prohibited by WADA in sport. The decision to use them belongs with you and a clinician who knows your medical history. If you are considering either peptide, read the full profiles on the CJC-1295 and ipamorelin pages for the regulatory and evidence picture, and talk to your doctor before making any changes.

Frequently asked

Is 200 mcg of CJC-1295/ipamorelin blend 200 mcg of each peptide or 200 mcg total?

In most community usage, 200 mcg refers to 200 mcg of the combined blend per injection, meaning roughly 100 mcg of each peptide if the vial is a 50/50 split. Vendor labels rarely clarify this, so check the certificate of analysis for the actual content per vial.

How many units should I draw for 200 mcg from a 10 mg vial reconstituted with 3 mL?

With 3 mL of bacteriostatic water in a 10,000 mcg vial, the concentration is approximately 3,333 mcg/mL. For 200 mcg: 200 divided by 3,333 equals 0.06 mL, which is 6 units on a U-100 insulin syringe. With 2 mL of water, the same dose would be 4 units.

Is CJC-1295/ipamorelin FDA-approved?

No. Neither CJC-1295 nor ipamorelin has marketing authorisation from the FDA, EMA, MHRA, or any national agency tracked on this site. The FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee reviewed ipamorelin in 2024 and did not recommend it for 503A compounding. Both peptides circulate as grey-market research chemicals.

What is the difference between CJC-1295 with DAC and without DAC?

The DAC (drug-affinity complex) version binds to serum albumin after injection, extending the half-life to roughly 6 to 8 days. The no-DAC version, also called MOD-GRF(1-29), has a much shorter half-life. Most blend vials contain the no-DAC form, but vendor labels do not always specify which version is included.

Sources

  1. [1]Drugs@FDA / DailyMed: no FDA-approved human medicine containing CJC-1295; one bulk ingredient listing for animal-drug compounding only (verified 2026-06-10)Tier 1 · primary
  2. [2]EMA medicines search: no marketing authorisation, EPAR, or referral for CJC-1295 (verified 2026-06-10)Tier 1 · primary
  3. [3]Teichman et al. (2006): Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295 in healthy adults (J Clin Endocrinol Metab; PMID 16352683)Tier 1 · primary
  4. [4]Raun et al. (1998): Ipamorelin, the first selective growth hormone secretagogue (Eur J Endocrinol; PMID 9849822)Tier 1 · primary
  5. [5]FDA: Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee meeting materials (29 Oct 2024; reviewed ipamorelin among other bulk drug substances)Tier 1 · primary
  6. [6]Ionescu & Frohman (2006): Pulsatile secretion of growth hormone persists during continuous stimulation by CJC-1295 (J Clin Endocrinol Metab; PMID 17018654)Tier 1 · primary
  7. [7]Mayfield et al. (2026): Injectable peptide therapy, a primer for orthopaedic and sports medicine physicians (Am J Sports Med; PMID 41476424)Tier 1 · primary

No revisions yet. First published .

About the editorial team

PeptideMethods is written and edited by the PeptideMethods Editorial Team and published by Digital Compass Group Ltd. The team is not made up of medical professionals; every health, regulatory or dosage claim on the site is tied to a primary source and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified clinician.

See our editorial policy and methodology for how we research, source and verify.

Read the pillars